I'm a mother of four who learned about vaccine injuries in 2004. Since then I've heard next to nothing about the topic from either family, media, counselors, 'support organization' leaders, or local police officials other than "Shut up. Shut up or we're going to make you wish you had." Not in those exact words, but the message was crystal clear.
I've never taken a dime from anyone for anything that's ever appeared on my site, nor for anything I've ever had to say about the matter. I have, however, paid dearly for it.
CDC scientist Dr. William Thompson breaks ten year silence on manipulation of data in vaccine study he co–authored, releasing statement through his lawyer. “I regret that my co–authors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics.”
“...public health officials have intentionally avoided researching whether subsets of children are "susceptible" to vaccine side effects - afraid the answer will scare the public.”
— Former head of the National Institute of Health Dr. Bernadine Healy in an interview on CBS
When the main stream media covers this issue, they would have you believe that there isn’t a sane doctor or scientist anywhere to be found on the planet who believes that vaccines could cause harm. The late Dr. Bernadine Healy was the former head of the National Institute of Health. Listen to what she had to say about the matter, here. Nothing has changed since this interview. The studies that would determine unequivocally whether there is a link between vaccines and autism have yet to be done.
In November of 2012 a US Congressional panel conducted hearings, during which bipartisan concern was expressed over evidence that the vaccine program may be linked to the increase in autism and alzheimers. Almost nothing was heard about those hearings on the television news (in between pharmaceutical commercials). To watch the full hearings, go to C-Span archives. Highlights can be seen on YouTube.
During these hearings, Dr. Boyle, of the CDC, left many questions unanswered. She promised, many times, that she would follow up on questions asked of her, and get the answers to those questions to Congress. But those answers have never been provided.
Congress agreed to hold additional hearings in November of 2013, but those hearings were cancelled days before they were scheduled to occur, with no explanation given as to why.
In 2007 CNN reported that the vast majority of flu shots contained mercury. Not a small amount of mercury, but the same toxic amount that was once in childhood vaccines. One third of flu shots currently (fifteen years after vaccine manufactures and health officials said it should be removed ) have thimerosal. Health officials and vaccine makers will tell you the mercury has been removed from vaccines, but it hasn't. It has only been moved.
Flu shots are now recommended for pregnant women and for babies. This was not the case twenty years ago.
The faces shown here are the tip of an iceberg. Yes, vaccines can and do cause autism, as well as a myriad of other neurological and auto–immune disorders.
Yes, I understand that the words these parents speak are not science. NEITHER IS CHANGING STUDY PROTOCOL MIDWAY THROUGH A STUDY BECAUSE THE RESULTS ARE NOT TURNING OUT TO BE WHAT ONE HAS HOPED FOR.
Bill Gates, in an interview with Dr. Sanjay Gupta on CNN, explaining that vaccines are perfectly safe. Want to see the whole interview? It’s here.
Oh yeah, this is the one where Bill accuses me and people like me of killing children. Want to accuse me in court, in front of a jury, Bill? Bring it on...
A lot of people will tell you that the mercury in the vaccine preservative Thimerosal is the ‘safe’ kind of mercury.
So ask them why there is a skull and crossbones on the label. Or why, in some states, thimerosal preserved vaccines must be disposed of as hazardous waste because of their mercury content. And while you’re at it, you might want to have a look at the Material Safety Data Sheet, which is available online.
Some vaccines are derived using cell lines from aborted humans.
Dr. Deisher obtained her Ph.D. in Molecular and Cellular Physiology from Stanford University and completed postdoctoral work at the University of Washington. She speaks of the use of fetal cell lines here, at the 10 min. 40 sec mark.
In 2010 Hannah Poling’s parents, a neurosurgeon and a nurse/lawyer, were awarded a multimillion dollar settlement when their little girl developed symptoms of severe autism after receiving nine vaccines in one day. Health officials and vaccine makers said at that time that she did not have autism, but only ‘symptoms of autism’, despite the fact that autism is not diagnosed by any biochemical testing but only rather based on the presence of sufficient symptoms. In other words, if someone has enough symptoms of autism, they then by definition have autism. They also said that her problems were the result not simply of the vaccines, but also of a ‘rare underlying mitochondrial disorder’. Current research suggests that mitochondrial disorders are not rare.
Compare the story of Hanna to that of Justina. In February of 2013 Justina Pelletier was taken into custody for a year and a half by the state of Massachusetts Department of Children and Families, after doctors at Boston Childrens Hospital said that her mitochondrial disorder, previously diagnosed in Justina by a Tufts Medical Center doctor, did not exist and that Justina was, rather, mentally ill. Efforts by Bostons Childrens Hospital to cure Justina of her ‘somatoform disorder’ resulted only in the serious decline of her health.
The United States Constitution, in it’s Bill of Rights (1st Amendment), states that:
‘Congress shall make no law … abridging … the right of the people … to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.’
And yet, when the US Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, they did just exactly that.
The vaccine injured and the parents of the vaccine injured are denied their right to sue for redress. Since the passage of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act in 1986 they’ve been able to present evidence only to a special Vaccine Court. In this ‘court’ parents are denied the right to a jury trial. They are denied the right to pretrial discovery—the process whereby evidence in the form of documents, depositions and subpoenas can be obtained. And now, with the Bruesewitz versus Wyeth ruling, the US Supreme Court has said that vaccine makers cannot be held liable in civil court, even in the event of a known and preventable design defect.
Your heart bleeds, but your veins are hollow.
Where I lead I know you'll follow.
And sure as hell, the lies you swallow
beggar belief — McDermott's 2 Hours
Contact me at Robin@nemeths.info.